Paxton’s defense lawyers have moved to dismiss all 20 articles of impeachment, arguing that the House failed to provide evidence supporting the allegations. However, the House managers have pre-emptively countered this claim through the extensive document release.
Title: Texas House Impeachment Managers Present Overwhelming Evidence Against Ken Paxton Ahead of Trial
The evidence presented in the exhibits includes:
- Testimonies from Paxton’s former personal aide, revealing document deliveries to Paul and discussions on property renovations paid for by Paul.
- Emails showing coordination between Paul, his lawyer, and a special prosecutor appointed by Paxton to target Paul’s business rivals and law enforcement officials.
- Memos outlining instances where Paxton’s senior advisors advised him to cut ties with Paul due to suspicions of dishonesty and criminal behavior.
- Uber trip records reveal Paxton’s use of a secret account under the alias “Dave P” to visit Paul’s residence and the location of an alleged extramarital affair.
- Evidence of Paul’s employment of Paxton’s alleged girlfriend at his business, substantiating claims of favoritism.
Furthermore, the exhibits reinforce the allegation that Paxton enlisted a state senator, Bryan Hughes, to seek a legal opinion that prevented foreclosure on Paul’s properties. The evidence shows Paxton’s deep involvement in the matter despite warnings from within his office that Paul’s claims lacked merit.
Title: Texas House Impeachment Managers Present Overwhelming Evidence Against Ken Paxton Ahead of Trial
The documents also reveal Paxton’s hiring of a special prosecutor with minimal experience, casting doubt on the motivations behind the investigation into Paul’s claims. Moreover, memos demonstrate Paxton’s advisors’ concerns over his increasing involvement with Paul’s legal matters, suggesting that Paxton was acting in favor of personal interests.
Title: Texas House Impeachment Managers Present Overwhelming Evidence Against Ken Paxton Ahead of Trial
The extensive evidence compiled by the House impeachment managers strengthens their case against Paxton and could influence senators’ decisions regarding the trial. While Paxton’s defense contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove wrongdoing, the comprehensive document release appears to counter their argument effectively.