IBM Plans to Make Llama 2 Available within Platform

IBM makes plans with Meta’s Llama 2. Plus, why open source may or may not be a differentiator in generative AI.We may be compensated by vendors who appear on this page through methods such as affiliate links or sponsored partnerships. This may influence how and where their products appear on our site, but vendors cannot pay to influence the content of our reviews. For more info, visit our Terms of Use page.

A sign with the Watson and IBM logos.
Image: MichaelVi/Adobe Stock

The race for territory in the generative AI-as-a-service world continues as IBM partners with Meta’s open-source large language model, Llama 2. Watsonx is a generative AI foundation model platform, while is the studio for building and fine-tuning foundation models, including generative AI and machine learning applications.

“IBM believes a platform is only as valuable as the ecosystem it enables,” said Tarun Chopra, vice president of product management for IBM Data and AI, in an email to TechRepublic. “All of the world’s enterprises and their customers — not just a select few — should benefit from foundation models and generative AI.”

Jump to:

What does Llama 2 add to

Users of IBM’s Watsonx data enterprise platform now have access to Meta’s Llama 2, IBM announced on July 18. Depending on the version, Llama 2 can be up to a 70-billion parameter model. It was trained on 2 trillion tokens of data from publicly available sources.

More must-read AI coverage

Including Llama 2 in Watsonx is part of a business strategy of portraying and providing “open innovation that’s guarded by embedded governance and trustworthy principles,” Chopra said.

Llama 2 is now available within the studio in early access for select clients and partners. IBM has not yet revealed a date for a full release.

The prompt lab has a guardrail function users can turn on or off to remove potentially harmful content from both the input and output text.

SEE: Hiring Kit: Prompt Engineer (TechRepublic Premium)

What is open source when it comes to generative AI?

There has been some opposition in the developer community over the use of the term open source in the context of Meta and Llama 2. The Open Source Initiative, one of the standards bodies behind open-source software, is still in the process of defining what open source means when referring to generative AI.

“The value in an AI tool isn’t simply in the model or algorithm,” said Peter Zaitsev, founder of open-source database software company Percona, in an email to TechRepublic. “An equally important element is the data or AI weights (a.k.a. neural net weights) used to train the model for a specific use or application. This aspect is inherently tricky for applying open source principles.”

Until the OSI develops a standard, companies like Meta “are misusing the ‘open’ title for their own benefit,” Zaitsev said.

How business leaders should decide on a generative AI platform

“Business leaders should seek platforms and models that can safely tap their organizations’ unique data sets and proprietary domain knowledge,” Chopra said.

He also offered the following questions to ask when choosing which generative AI platform to use:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Demo Title

Demo Description

This will close in 30 seconds

“The Extraordinary Lives of the Brontë Sisters: Literary Geniuses” The Cognitive Benefits of Pets for Your Child’s Brain Development Raising Resilient Kids: How to Talk to Children About Stress The Disturbing Predictions of 20th-Century Prophetess Baba Vanga “Invasion Warning: One of Earth’s Most Feared Creatures Heads to UK”